GSTN Fix: Appeals Now Allowed Against NIL / Zero Demand Orders

-

✅ Zero Demand? You Can Now File a GST Appeal

📖 2 min read 🗓️ Advisory dated 07-09-2026 🏛️ Team GSTN

💡 Ever been stuck with a demand order showing "NIL" — yet still had a genuine dispute — and the portal simply wouldn't let you appeal? That roadblock is now gone. GSTN has removed the validation that was blocking these appeals.

📌 What Was the Problem?

A taxpayer sometimes has a genuine dispute over liability, but the demand order shows the amount as "NIL" or "Zero" — typically because payment was already made before the demand order was issued. Until now, the GST Portal's validation blocked any appeal against such orders.

🎉 What's Changed Now?

The restricting validation has been removed from the GST Portal. Taxpayers can now file an appeal in Form GST APL-01 against demand orders reflecting a NIL or Zero demand amount. ✅

🧭 What Should You Do?

1 If you're facing this exact issue, go ahead and file your appeal in Form GST APL-01 against the NIL/Zero demand order.
2 Run into any query or difficulty while filing? Raise a ticket with the GST Helpdesk for assistance.

✅ Key Takeaways

  • The portal validation that blocked appeals against NIL / Zero demand orders has been removed.
  • This helps taxpayers who had a genuine dispute but whose demand showed as NIL because payment was made before the order was issued.
  • You can now file the appeal in Form GST APL-01.
  • Stuck while filing? Raise a ticket with the GST Helpdesk.

📢 Know someone whose GST appeal was stuck on a NIL demand? Share this update with them — and drop your questions in the comments below.

www.nrk.info



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Partner Remuneration is Business Income: Expenses (Including Depreciation) Allowed

-
Image
Partner Remuneration is Business Income: Expenses (Including Depreciation) Allowed Delhi ITAT Confirms Section 28(v) Classification and Upholds Consistency Rule. The Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has provided critical clarity for partners of professional firms, confirming that remuneration received is classified as Business Income , not 'Salary'. This classification under Section 28(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 , allows the partner to claim legitimate business expenditures against that income. The Dispute: CA Partner's Expense Claim The case involved an assessee, a chartered accountant partner, who received remuneration/salary from his partnership firm (Assessment Year 2018-19). The dispute arose over the treatment of expenses: Assessee's Action: Claimed business-related expenses, including depreciation on a motor car, again...
Read more

Deciphering GSTR-9 Table 8A: The Auto-Population Logic Explained

-
Image
Understanding the ITC Data Flow from GSTR-2B to the Annual Return. Table 8A of GSTR 9 is a crucial component of the Annual Return, as it captures the eligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) details for a specific financial year. This table is entirely auto-populated by the GST system based on the filed returns and statements. Understanding the precise time frame the system uses is essential for reconciling your books with the portal data. What is Table 8A of GSTR 9? Core Function: Table 8A of GSTR 9 for FY 2024-25 capture the details of documents / records pertaining to FY 2024-25 appearing in GSTR 2B . Therefore, this table essentially serves as the system's calculated total of eligible ITC available to the taxpayer as per GSTR-2B for the financial year. How is Table 8A Auto-Populated? The auto-population mechanism follows ...
Read more

Employee Cannot Be Penalized: TDS Credit Allowed Despite Employer's Default

-
Image
Delhi ITAT Upholds Tax Credit Based on Salary Slips, Overruling Form 26AS/Form 16 Denial. A recent ruling by the Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) delivers crucial relief to employees facing denial of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) credit due to non-compliance by their former employer. The Tribunal confirmed that the Revenue cannot deny tax credit to an employee if the employee can provide substantive evidence (like salary slips) showing that tax was actually deducted from their salary, regardless of the employer's failure to remit the tax or issue Form 16 . Background of the Dispute The Facts: The assessee (an ex-employee of TLPL) received gross salary and had TDS deducted under Section 192 . However, the employer neither provided Form 16 nor remitted the TDS amount to the government account. Disallowance: The assessee...
Read more